Re: which brnach?
Nate Riffe <[email protected]> Thu, 21 Oct 2004 20:44:04 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.bbc.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I cannot believe Rob Nichols said this on the ENTARNET: > I tinkered with STABLE a year or so ago, and was able to get what I > wanted (add some apps, remove some,, support for my hardware, etc...). > I've got some time again and wanted to play with this some more. > Looks like a *lot* has changed in the past year. > > I'd like to build research, or a derivative, on a gentoo system. (Can > do chroot, but thought I'd see if it will build on gentoo.) Tried the > research branch and ran into some trouble configuring perl. Before > diving in and figuring out what the problem is, I wanted to see what > branch people would suggest? I don't know of any branch that is known to successfully build on gentoo, but research is probably the closest. The trouble you ran into with perl is mostly a product of perl's godaweful configure script. We generally try to avoid messing with perl any more than we have to, although the package is probably due for an upgrade. If you'd like to try your hand, I'd start with that. -Nate -- --< ((\))< >----< [email protected] >----< http://www.movealong.org/ >-- pub 1024D/05A058E0 2002-03-07 Nate Riffe (06-Mar-2002) <[email protected]> Key fingerprint = 0DAC F5CB D182 3165 D757 C466 CD42 12A8 05A0 58E0