Re: compile crash #1
Sokar Someone <[email protected]> Sat, 21 Jan 2006 17:16:43 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.bbc.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
ok, I'll give that a try tonight. On the cvs vs subversion issue: I personally have no prefernce since i have never used both. The 1 that is easiest to use would be my preference. The 1 that makes it harder for me to screw something up would also probably be a good choice. On another issue what are we going to do about version numbering?=20 Just start over from 0.0? Also, are we going to upgrade to GTK2.X ?? (its a requirement for several of the programs i was thinking about adding. --ME On 1/21/06, Paul Gray <[email protected]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 10:06:42PM -0600, Sokar Someone wrote: > > changed to debian stable gcc --version =3D=3D 3.3.5-13 > > > > getting the : > > > > ../../gcc-2.95.3/gcc/libgcc2.c:41 stdlib.h: No such file or directory > > ../../gcc-2.95.3/gcc/libgcc2.c:42 unistd.h: No such file or directory > > > > error... again > > > > dl'd bbc-2.1-with-sources.tar.gz > > > > is there something else i am supposed to be working with? > > > > The bbc-2.1-with-sources.tar.gz would be a bit outdated. A tarball of th= e > current snapshot that I'm building with, which compiles from start to fin= ish > without intervention on a fresh install of Debian Sarge, can be obtained = from: > > http://bccd.cs.uni.edu/bbc-images/lnx-bbc.tar.bz2 > > If it doesn't compile for you, chances are you have a Debian package miss= ing, > such as bin86. I can provide my Debian package list from > 'dpkg --get-selections' and walk anyone through an 'apt-get dselect-upgra= de' > if there's interest. > > This tarball has gar.conf.mk set up to fetch things from bccd.cs.uni.edu'= s > garchive first, lnx-bbc.org second. I have direct access to bccd.cs.uni.= edu > and can make sure that the garchive is "sync'd". > > This brings up a great question, Sokar. Going forward, how should the t= ree be > maintained? I started on the lnx-bbc with cvs and can continue working w= ith > arch. There's also subversion. Does anyone have a compelling reason to = use > one or the other? > - -- > Paul Gray -o) > 323 Wright Hall /\\ > University of Northern Iowa _\_V > Message void if penguin violated ... Don't mess with the penguin > No one says, "Hey, I can't read that ASCII attachment ya sent me." > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFD0mErOH45TZW7mh4RAoKAAJsF6X35I/Fs97DcoT+Qlk2uvTxgEgCfQeGh > mInlh5kzdbjDHvRHJ9kjNZ0=3D > =3DOeHG > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > -- irc.virrox.com #cedarlug http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=3Dirc random quote(s) for the week http://qdb.us/53602 http://www.bash.org/?599816 http://www.bash.org/?601393 http://www.bash.org/?601458 http://www.bash.org/?602263 http://qdb.us/54060 truth is rarely appreciated: http://www.laddertheory.com/