Re: compile crash #1

Sokar Someone <[email protected]> Sat, 21 Jan 2006 17:16:43 -0600
Newsgroups gmane.linux.bbc.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
ok, I'll give that a try tonight.

On the cvs vs subversion issue: I personally have no prefernce since i
have never used both.  The 1 that is easiest to use would be my
preference.  The 1 that makes it harder for me to screw something up
would also probably be a good choice.

On another issue what are we going to do about version numbering?=20
Just start over from 0.0?

Also, are we going to upgrade to GTK2.X ?? (its a requirement for
several of the programs i was thinking about adding.

--ME



On 1/21/06, Paul Gray <[email protected]> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 10:06:42PM -0600, Sokar Someone wrote:
> > changed to debian stable gcc --version =3D=3D 3.3.5-13
> >
> > getting the :
> >
> > ../../gcc-2.95.3/gcc/libgcc2.c:41 stdlib.h: No such file or directory
> > ../../gcc-2.95.3/gcc/libgcc2.c:42 unistd.h: No such file or directory
> >
> > error... again
> >
> > dl'd bbc-2.1-with-sources.tar.gz
> >
> > is there something else i am supposed to be working with?
> >
>
> The bbc-2.1-with-sources.tar.gz would be a bit outdated.  A tarball of th=
e
> current snapshot that I'm building with, which compiles from start to fin=
ish
> without intervention on a fresh install of Debian Sarge, can be obtained =
from:
>
>   http://bccd.cs.uni.edu/bbc-images/lnx-bbc.tar.bz2
>
> If it doesn't compile for you, chances are you have a Debian package miss=
ing,
> such as bin86.  I can provide my Debian package list from
> 'dpkg --get-selections' and walk anyone through an 'apt-get dselect-upgra=
de'
> if there's interest.
>
> This tarball has gar.conf.mk set up to fetch things from bccd.cs.uni.edu'=
s
> garchive first, lnx-bbc.org second.  I have direct access to bccd.cs.uni.=
edu
> and can make sure that the garchive is "sync'd".
>
> This brings up a great question, Sokar.   Going forward, how should the t=
ree be
> maintained?  I started on the lnx-bbc with cvs and can continue working w=
ith
> arch.  There's also subversion.  Does anyone have a compelling reason to =
use
> one or the other?
> - --
> Paul Gray                                         -o)
> 323 Wright Hall                                   /\\
> University of Northern Iowa                      _\_V
> Message void if penguin violated ...  Don't mess with the penguin
> No one says, "Hey, I can't read that ASCII attachment ya sent me."
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFD0mErOH45TZW7mh4RAoKAAJsF6X35I/Fs97DcoT+Qlk2uvTxgEgCfQeGh
> mInlh5kzdbjDHvRHJ9kjNZ0=3D
> =3DOeHG
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>


--
irc.virrox.com  #cedarlug

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=3Dirc

random quote(s) for the week
http://qdb.us/53602
http://www.bash.org/?599816
http://www.bash.org/?601393
http://www.bash.org/?601458
http://www.bash.org/?602263
http://qdb.us/54060

truth is rarely appreciated:
http://www.laddertheory.com/