Re: Debian installer questions...

On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 09:15:15AM -0700, Heather Stern wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 07:05:00PM -0400, Tom von Schwerdtner wrote:
> > Greetings all,
> > 
> >     On the topic of a Debian installer....
> > 
> >     1) I understand there used to be one...what happend to it?
>  
> There used to be 2, one utterly undocumented.
> 
> In the 1.618 they no longer work because the debian world has moved too
> far away from what they expect to see.  Slink is only available from the
> more ancient archives, and woody is drastically different from what it
> saw as testing at the time, even for base.
> 
> In the new one we had several plans for doing something that would
> survive the test of time ... well, at least until that debian flavor was
> moved to the ancient archives.  Storing a base tarball on the 2.x
> plastic is out of the question - for that much space, we could ship
> mozilla as our web browser.
> 
> >     2) Ideas for a new installer?
> > 
> >         a) Anyone looked at using debchroot?  
> >             I've installed a number of debian systems with it and it works
> >             quite well (seems perfect for the task).
  
I'm advised that debchroot is a rather old name for an early rendition
of debootstrap.

Debootstrap was one of the 2 installers on 1.618.  Its dependency on
knowing the names of the packages that comprise base became its eventual
doom.

Other "package" partial installers for debian include: replicator,
pbuilder (which I think deps on modern debootstrap), fai (too big),
and "snarf a really big tarball".

> The checklist of hard parts in an installer.
>   1. partitioning.  don't forget a swap.
>      ...the model of "you should do this part yourself" is very geeky,
>      but it doesn't work for everyone.
>   2. snarfing the kernel you're currently booted from and putting it in.
>      ...this turns out to be *really* hard - the lnx-bbc's initrd is 
>      wired up for seeking out the cdrom and mounting a cloop.
>   3. dumping bits in.  whose bits, from where?
>      ...in our case we can't be lazy like knoppix and just dump
>      ourselves in, sicne it wouldn't be debian.  Though it would be 
>      Linux.
>   4. setting new root user, net setup, and other "firstboot" actions.
> 
> The concept appears to be that we'll create a garpkg for it - thus
> anyone with a 2.x bbc should be able to download it at will - but we've
> all been bogged with other things which seem to have priority.  
> 
> I'm vaguely tempted to steal some logic from knoppix' knx-hdinstall now
> that it's seen a little debugging, where the baseline for what gets
> dumped in is from Sneakum's chroot build environment.
> 
> We welcome new developers to the team, so if you'd like to package
> debchroot for the GAR tree, let us know when you've got something that
> builds locally, and one of the committers could graft it in.

You'll probably find that there's no decent upstream source for
debchroot, and the GAR mechanism depends on being able to get the
sources from upstream.  But feel free to experiment, if you're inclined
to play with a local copy of the LNX-BBC source tree.
 
>   . | .   Heather Stern                  |         [email protected]
> --->*<--- Starshine Technical Services - * - [email protected]
>   ' | `   Sysadmin Support and Training  |        (800) 938-4078
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lnx-bbc mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://zork.net/mailman/listinfo/lnx-bbc