Re: proggy list................was Re: site FAQ - question missing...
Drew Northup N1XIM <[email protected]> 13 Aug 2003 23:42:01 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.bbc.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I really didn't expect an answer to my idea, but I like the way that you've taken it. If you were to list things by the application that installed them you'd have to write a whole hell of a lot less -- which sacrificing very little real-world look-up time....... Drew Northup, N1XIM On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 11:44, Heather Stern wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 11:44:26PM -0400, Drew Northup N1XIM wrote: > > Umm...........yeah...................that's a big problem. Those of us > > who swear by Tom's RTBT always know what's on the disk because it tells > > us. Now, I don't think that having the LNX-BBC do that at boot with > > 1000+ programs is going to sit well, but providing a file with a simple > > listing (culled from the build scripts, perhaps automagically) would > > certianly help--oh and a "type BLAH to find out what you have here" > > would help too. > > > > I'd write up the "scriptlet" thingy needed if I knew how or had the time > > to learn........... > > Well, let's see. Our nearest obvious competitor, tomsrtbt, pesters the > newly logging in root user with: > > you have bla bla foo bing baz bar .. > ... several lines wortth of program names > ... bla bla ginger bla bla. > > We obviously have a lot more than that, but the interface of saying > simply, you have "nn" could be handy. I remember thinking very happy > thoughts when it just gave me the root prompt instead of dumping me into > a huge readme. I like the readme, it's useful, but now, I wonder if > people don't read it because it can be assumed to be absent. > > So, prefacing giving them the prompt with > You have 1000+ programs. Type 'BLAH*' to list them all. > To reach the internet, try 'trivial-net-setup'. > For some readme files, type 'help'. > > + If anybody feels inclined to having something count them and burn > this in that'd be amusing, otherwise say 1000+ or over 1000. > * I have forgotten what BLAH is. I don't need a list, I'm soaked in the > dev tree, so in my case it'd be more to check if something -wasn't- > there... > > But 3 or 4 lines isn't any more expensive than most people's MOTD file > and frankly it's much shorter and more useful than Debian's standard > one. > > However, I favor the idea of having some notefiles on the disc, > especially those that are most useful at single user mode. Perhaps > something like the copyright mechanism we now use, could be used to > offer up doc files as well. A URL can be offered in which case the > suggested "it'll need the net you know" wrapper could be applied. > In fact I'll go one better and say that we could prep a single html > file, which lists these helpful URLs attached to their program name. > Any local files can just be read that way - lynx is quite a decent > pager, and I'm sure the same can be said for the other two textmode > browsers. Any full URLs will of course require the net, but then > the browser will pretty much say so > (trying to connect to www.tldp.org...) > > If combined with a 1 line description of what the program is supposed > to be, we get the full program list, a "what the hell are these things" > list, local doc pages (maybe stripped man pages, maybe 2 paragraphs by > the pkg maintainer), and URLs to full docs all in one thingy. Which > starts to make it worth the space of the wasted HTML tagstuff. > > The only problem that remains then is that most packages cough up more > than one binary, and each might want a little documentation. Still, if > we accept the Blurb from "package description goes here" in the > Makefile, and since the copyright widget already supports multiple > files, I don't think it's really that hard to give a shot. > > . | . Heather Stern | [email protected] > --->*<--- Starshine Technical Services - * - [email protected] > ' | ` Sysadmin Support and Training | (800) 938-4078 > > _______________________________________________ > lnx-bbc mailing list > [email protected] > http://zork.net/mailman/listinfo/lnx-bbc