Re: Enforcing coreboot as lowercase

David Hendricks <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.bios
Message-ID <CAJ_ov54=_7et-03LAU3eKP=xrdDwmStu6y_hEubjjuMBQu018Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 10:46 AM Arthur Heymans <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> Are you proposing to give up trying to defend the spelling of the
>> project's name because too many people write it wrong and educating
>> them is too much effort? If so, I think this is a self-defeating
>> attitude and I completely disagree with it.
>
>
> Language is not a set in stone thing. There are default grammatical rules
> on how to write things and sometimes it is worth it to override the rules
> as I explained.
> It's basically a trade-off.
> There is no right and wrong here, except maybe from a trademark
> perspective, which most people are unaware of.
> Later I make the case that even from a trademark perspective I don't think
> it matters.
> I'm making the case that enforcing to write "coreboot" lowercase has more
> downsides than upsides, which is why I propose to allow "Coreboot" at the
> start of a sentence.
> Personally I think educating people about a trademark thing is superfluous
> work.
> Also in my personal communication it's a conundrum.
> For instance if I write a blog post I don't want to look like I'm making
> silly grammatical mistakes to those that haven't looked into the trademark
> registry (which almost no one does).
> At the same time I don't want to explain the trademark either as I think
> it blunts communicative efficiency.
>
> Or is it that the trademark only covers the all-lowercase "coreboot"
>> spelling, so one can use a name like "CoReboot" (e.g. for something
>> unrelated) without infringing the "coreboot" trademark? In that case,
>> making the trademark case-insensitive makes sense.
>>
>
> So currently the only reason lowercase coreboot is enforced is because
> that's how the trademark was obtained.
> I'm using the argument that trademark interpretation is typically broad
> and allows for using an uppercase letter at the start of a sentence since
> that's what grammatical rules want.
> So I think "Coreboot" is very much covered by the "coreboot" trademark.
>

This matches my understanding that trademarks cover variations of font,
size, color, and combinations of upper/lowercase lettering. No need to be
overly pedantic about writing "coreboot" versus "Coreboot" etc. so long as
the project is not misrepresented. If a company tries to sell a product
called "CoReBoOt" or something then we'll C&D them.

We should probably use `coreboot` in areas internal to coreboot, such as
our documentation, but I wouldn't ding people for using `Coreboot` in
casual contexts such as forums, commit messages, etc.

_______________________________________________
coreboot mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.