Re: [PATCH] Ignore built files

"Jaap A. Haitsma" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.bluez.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Jan 16, 2008 8:47 PM, Marcel Holtmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Bastien,
>
> > > > > I don't see the need and especially since the long-term goal is to move
> > > > > to git, it will become useless.
> > > >
> > > > I thought we wanted to move bluez-gnome to GNOME's SVN...
> > >
> > > personally I think that Subversion is as worse as CVS and I don't see
> > > any advantage for a switch to that. Convincing me that GNOME's
> > > infrastructure makes sense is different, but from a pure technical
> > > standpoint of the SCM, Subversion is not an argument I am gonna buy
> > > into.
> >
> > I'm not getting into SCM discussions, if GNOME was still using CVS, I'd
> > still be using CVS (and so forth). What I meant was using the GNOME
> > infrastructure to get translators, documentation writers, and plenty of
> > pairs of eyeballs for the code.
>
> for me it really boils down to the SCM in the end. I am not a big fan of
> CVS, but switching to SVN is not an option. Best would be if GNOME would
> support GIT, because then we can switch right now.
>
Marcel,

You can use git-svn on SVN repositories to get almost full git
functionality [1]. Quite some GNOME developers already use that for
modules in GNOME SVN.

Jaap

[1] http://live.gnome.org/GitForGnomeDevelopers

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.