Re: [PATCH] client.c cleanup
Marcel Holtmann <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.bluez.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1201630440.6218.31.camel@violet> |
Hi Bastien, > > > I think for most of those it would mean clearing the children of the > > > adapters (removing them from the tree). Not sure what's wrong about the > > > bdaddr not appearing for newly inserted devices though, probably just a > > > missing call. > > > > that is a bug or missing signal. Keeping the adapter allows us to keep > > the D-Bus proxy object and will prevent from duplicate signals. Removing > > the adapter would mean to also remove the signal handles etc. Seemed why > > to ugly for me. > > I'm talking about removing the children (ie. the devices), not the > adapter itself. Which makes sense, as they shouldn't be associated with > a non-existant adapter. we can do that. Makes sense to me. Purge all children on adapter removal. Regards Marcel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/