Re: ARM optimization
"Brad Midgley" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.bluez.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Marcel The other macros are not being used and I had intended to remove them. We use only MUL/MULA. > My idea would be to keep the semantic of MULA and only make it a two > stage thing. In case of no assembler we still use MULA as it is right > now, but in case of assembler it calls MULA_ARM which will do the > calculations and then the assignment. Will this work? Is the compiler > smart enough to optimize the code properly. I don't know how to do this but maybe Cidorvan can see it. -- Brad ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/