Re: bluez+dbus: why glib binding

Hi Choi,

> > We use glib for the mainloop, the XML parser and other things.
> 
> Does glib impose a big memory footprint on the system or is it ok for
> embedded systems ?

in most cases you need it for some other applications, too. So it is
there anyway. For the Nokia Tablets and OpenMoko it seems good enough.

> > We will have hard dependencies on dbus and glib (not dbus-glib).
> 
> Maybe I'm confusing terms - but don't you use dbus' glib binding
> (isn't that dbus-glib?) ?

We use the dbus-glib only in bluez-gnome. The bluez-utils depends on
glib and dbus. And that is different.

> If not - what do you use instead ? directly the libdus C lowlevel library ?
> or some other binding ?
> IOW - is it possible to use glib binding without dbus-glib ?

You don't get it. The dbus-glib bindings are an integration of dbus into
the GObject model (libgobject). We don't use that. Yes, we use glib, but
not gobject and yes, we use dbus (low-level libdbus).

Regards

Marcel



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/