Re: [PATCH] Simplify about dialog code

Bastien Nocera <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.bluez.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 00:23 +0100, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> Hi Bastien,
> 
> > > > Before you're holidays I sent you a patch which simplifies the about
> > > > dialog code. We went on discussing it but didn't come to a conclusion,
> > > > I think
> > > 
> > > I am not going on holidays. At least not that I know of :)
> > > 
> > > > In my opinion it's a good patch because:
> > > > 
> > > > 1) The patch removes about 20 function calls
> > > > 2) You don't need  to hookup signals to the about dialog
> > > > 3) Eog, cheese, gnome-power-manager, nautilus, gedit to name a few all
> > > > do it this way.
> > > 
> > > Still not convinced.
> > 
> > Using gtk_dialog_run() means that you're running the main loop from the
> > about box code. Fixing this would add code. The patch Jaap sent removes
> > a lot of code, and avoids things like double-about boxes, or crappy
> > backtraces that show the about box callback function :)
> 
> I have really no idea what you are talking about. How does this change
> do all this magic?

The change binds the GtkAbout to the application so GTK+ keeps track of
the about box existing or not, and not us. So it avoids multiple about
boxes being displayed.

> And what crappy backtraces?

Crappy backtrace are the ones run from within the gtk_run_dialog() in
the about dialog callback. When yoy show the about box, and don't
dismiss it, your application is running its main loop from your
gtk_dialog_run() call. If the application crashes, the backtrace will be
from your gtk_dialog_run() call, not from the gtk_main() in main.

It's a simple fix that rids your own code of the book-keeping for this
dialogue.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.