Re: SBC optimizations
"Brad Midgley" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.bluez.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Cidorvan How significant is the volume drop in 4 subbands? Should we just leave the decoder at 64 bit mults so we don't needlessly suffer quality issues on faster platforms? Brad On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Cidorvan Leite <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi! > > I replaced the 64bits multiplies by 32bits and fixed the volume, now > the encode and decode are >10% faster. > Unfortunately, I couldn't keep the same volume for decode with 4 subbands... > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Bluez-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel > > -- Brad ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/