Re: isqrt tweak and factor(1) questions
Denys Vlasenko via busybox <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.busybox |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAK1hOcM0-jcFJo4Xk_RKmcZv2ep_QOH0dy8ZG-os=Zh9pS06kg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Feb 5, 2026 at 2:34 AM David Sparks <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thursday, February 5th, 2026 at 00:42, David Sparks <[email protected]> wrote: > >> TLS code has some arbitrary-precision binary code. > > > > Ooh! I should hack on that! I notice that it lacks __int128 > > support, and that could be a big speed boost. (Compiler support > > can be tested with #ifdef SIZEOF_INT128.) > > Never mind; on more than 60 seconds' reading, I notice that it > *does* have 128-bit support (just disabled for code size reasons), > and, as a verbatim import, hacking on it would make merges with > upstream more difficult. I think matrixSSL is not active anymore. _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] https://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox