Re: [PATCH 2/2] shell: fix for 'wait -n' return 127 when nothing to wait

Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca via busybox <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.busybox
Message-ID <CAJq09z7mFhs4P6CpQnU2bZY=sVxLta4hXwc+Q21eoHqf3yyUiA@mail.gmail.com>
> On Thu, 6 Nov 2025 at 23:57, Dominique Martinet <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > From: Dominique Martinet <[email protected]>
> >
> > wait -n would only return 127 if there is no job, not if there is no job
> > not accounted for.
> >
>
> Hi,
> I have applied the patch from Luiz just because he was the last one to
> submit on that topic (ash wait) but I realised that the BASH_WAIT_N
> symbol is undefined and it has no corresponding voice in the
> menuconfig.

Hi,

BASH_WAIT_N is set by ENABLE_ASH_BASH_COMPAT value in ash.c. Just grep
for it and check the first occurrence.

> Are these patches in any manner related?

Fixing similar issues but I wasn't aware of it. I just checked
bugzilla for similar issues but it was a partial search as bugzilla
and the site itself was very unstable these days. Most of my searches
were using external cached pages.

> Or are two independent approaches to the same issue?

Yes, independent. Sorry I missed the Dominique Martinet patch series.

> https://github.com/robang74/busybox/commit/7878ca060921422046c98d294a0aeecbf1b7f912
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Roberto A. Foglietta
> +49.176.274.75.661
> +39.349.33.30.697

Regards,

Luiz
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.