[PATCH] libbb: rename two fields in ioloop_state, no logic changes

Victor Erminpour via busybox <[email protected]> Tue, 21 Apr 2026 00:33:05 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.linux.busybox
Message-ID <[email protected]>
From: Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]>
---
 include/libbb.h      |  4 ++--
 libbb/ioloop.c       | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
 networking/telnet.c  | 16 ++++++++--------
 networking/telnetd.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 4 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/libbb.h b/include/libbb.h
index 0fee62929..a54f17d49 100644
--- a/include/libbb.h
+++ b/include/libbb.h
@@ -728,8 +728,8 @@ typedef struct ioloop_state {
 	ioloop_state_t *io; \
 	int read_fd; \
 	int write_fd; \
-	int (*have_buffer_to_read_into)(void *this); \
-	int (*have_data_to_write)(void *this); \
+	int (*should_poll_read_fd)(void *this); \
+	int (*should_poll_write_fd)(void *this); \
 	int (*read)(void *this); \
 	int (*write)(void *this); \
 
diff --git a/libbb/ioloop.c b/libbb/ioloop.c
index cc9876487..fbd780cf8 100644
--- a/libbb/ioloop.c
+++ b/libbb/ioloop.c
@@ -76,19 +76,19 @@ void FAST_FUNC ioloop_close_fd_in_all_conns(ioloop_state_t *io, int fd)
 }
 #endif
 
-// have_data_to_write() - Do we have data to write?
+// should_poll_write_fd() - Should ioloop poll write_fd for writability?
 // May return error if knows that write side is closed, even if it has free buffer space.
-// > 0: Has data to write (or can generate such data)
+// > 0: Yes, poll write_fd (has data to write, or can generate such data)
 //    In this case, write_fd must be valid! (it's a bug if it is < 0, can crash)
-// 0: No data to write currently
+// 0: No, don't poll write_fd currently
 // < 0: error, I probably freed myself (do not use my structure in this iteration,
 // on next iteration, if I indeed freed myself, you won't find me in the list).
 //
-// have_buffer_to_read_into() - Is there a buffer to read into?
+// should_poll_read_fd() - Should ioloop poll read_fd for readability?
 // May return error if knows that write side is closed, even if it has free buffer space.
-// > 0: Healthy, has buffer space, please poll read_fd
+// > 0: Yes, poll read_fd (has buffer space, healthy)
 //    In this case, read_fd must be valid! (it's a bug if it is < 0)
-// 0: One of:
+// 0: No, don't poll read_fd. One of:
 //    Buffer is full (hopefully write() will free some)
 //    Got error/EOF, want to drain write buffer first
 // < 0: Error/EOF, I probably freed myself (do not use my structure)
@@ -121,26 +121,26 @@ void FAST_FUNC ioloop_close_fd_in_all_conns(ioloop_state_t *io, int fd)
 // Putting "this connection is dead, close+remove+free" code into read function
 // is often inconvenient: if you got EOF/error on read, you still want to poll write side
 // and try to write out the buffered data to it. Which means read() can't "remove+free".
-// Instead, you can remember EOF/error and make future have_buffer_to_read_into() respond 0.
+// Instead, you can remember EOF/error and make future should_poll_read_fd() respond 0.
 // One way is to close (if possible) read_fd, set it to -1 and use as a flag.
 //
 // If need to support one-sided close, such as when HTTP/1.x client sends us
 // "GET / HTTP/1.1\r\n\r\n" and closes its writing side with shutdown(SHUT_WR),
 // the idiom is that when read() sees EOF, it sets conn->read_fd to -1
-// and subsequently have_buffer_to_read_into() always return 0 (no more attempts to read);
+// and subsequently should_poll_read_fd() always return 0 (no more attempts to read);
 // write() flushes all remaining data to conn->write_fd and then signals EOF
 // to write_fd: shutdown(SHUT_WR) for sockets, close() for pipes
 // (how to do this for ptys!?).
-// After this, have_data_to_write() can return 0 if fd has to stay open (socket)
+// After this, should_poll_write_fd() can return 0 if fd has to stay open (socket)
 // or can return -1 and free itself if fd is closed.
 
-static ALWAYS_INLINE int have_data_to_write(connection_t *conn)
+static ALWAYS_INLINE int should_poll_write_fd(connection_t *conn)
 {
-	return conn->have_data_to_write(conn);
+	return conn->should_poll_write_fd(conn);
 }
-static ALWAYS_INLINE int have_buffer_to_read_into(connection_t *conn)
+static ALWAYS_INLINE int should_poll_read_fd(connection_t *conn)
 {
-	return conn->have_buffer_to_read_into(conn);
+	return conn->should_poll_read_fd(conn);
 }
 static ALWAYS_INLINE int write_from_buf(connection_t *conn)
 {
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ int FAST_FUNC ioloop_run(ioloop_state_t *io)
 		int rcw, rcr;
 
 		next = conn->next; /* in case conn is freed */
-		rcw = have_data_to_write(conn);
+		rcw = should_poll_write_fd(conn);
 		if (rcw < 0) {
 			/* often indicates that conn is gone (freed), do not use it anymore */
 			goto next;
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ int FAST_FUNC ioloop_run(ioloop_state_t *io)
 		 * the *reader* may decide to abort (return rcr < 0)!
 		 * Check it first:
 		 */
-		rcr = have_buffer_to_read_into(conn);
+		rcr = should_poll_read_fd(conn);
 		if (rcr < 0)
 			goto next;
 		if (rcw > 0) {
diff --git a/networking/telnet.c b/networking/telnet.c
index a0eadc91b..227a37907 100644
--- a/networking/telnet.c
+++ b/networking/telnet.c
@@ -576,7 +576,7 @@ static void show_menu(void)
 		cookmode();
 }
 
-static int have_buffer_to_read_from_stdin(void *this)
+static int should_poll_read_fd_stdin(void *this)
 {
 	stdin_to_net_t *conn = this;
 	if (conn->read_fd < 0)
@@ -656,7 +656,7 @@ static int read_from_stdin(void *this)
 	return count;
 }
 
-static int have_data_to_write_to_net(void *this)
+static int should_poll_write_fd_net(void *this)
 {
 	stdin_to_net_t *conn = this;
 	if (conn->size == 0 && conn->read_fd < 0) {
@@ -700,7 +700,7 @@ static int write_to_net(void *this)
 	return count;
 }
 
-static int have_buffer_to_read_from_net(void *this)
+static int should_poll_read_fd_net(void *this)
 {
 	net_to_stdout_t *conn = this;
 	if (conn->read_fd < 0)
@@ -897,7 +897,7 @@ static int read_from_net(void *this)
 	return count;
 }
 
-static int have_data_to_write_to_stdout(void *this)
+static int should_poll_write_fd_stdout(void *this)
 {
 	net_to_stdout_t *conn = this;
 	if (conn->size == 0 && conn->read_fd < 0) {
@@ -988,16 +988,16 @@ int telnet_main(int argc UNUSED_PARAM, char **argv)
 	signal(SIGPIPE, SIG_IGN);
 
 	// Initialize connections
-	G.conn_stdin2net.have_buffer_to_read_into = have_buffer_to_read_from_stdin;
-	G.conn_stdin2net.have_data_to_write = have_data_to_write_to_net;
+	G.conn_stdin2net.should_poll_read_fd = should_poll_read_fd_stdin;
+	G.conn_stdin2net.should_poll_write_fd = should_poll_write_fd_net;
 	G.conn_stdin2net.read = read_from_stdin;
 	G.conn_stdin2net.write = write_to_net;
 	if (STDIN_FILENO != 0)
 		G.conn_stdin2net.read_fd = STDIN_FILENO;
 	G.conn_stdin2net.write_fd = netfd;
 
-	G.conn_net2stdout.have_buffer_to_read_into = have_buffer_to_read_from_net;
-	G.conn_net2stdout.have_data_to_write = have_data_to_write_to_stdout;
+	G.conn_net2stdout.should_poll_read_fd = should_poll_read_fd_net;
+	G.conn_net2stdout.should_poll_write_fd = should_poll_write_fd_stdout;
 	G.conn_net2stdout.read = read_from_net;
 	G.conn_net2stdout.write = write_to_stdout;
 	G.conn_net2stdout.read_fd = netfd;
diff --git a/networking/telnetd.c b/networking/telnetd.c
index 3eb9446a2..880d3c63b 100644
--- a/networking/telnetd.c
+++ b/networking/telnetd.c
@@ -279,8 +279,8 @@ static void ALWAYS_INLINE remove_and_free_to_net(pty_to_net_t *ts)
 // Theory of operation
 // (AKA "when should I close fds? when should I detach from ioloop?").
 // The fds are named read_fd and write_fd, but for clarity let's call them netfd and ptyfd.
-// net_to_pty::have_data_to_write
-// net_to_pty::have_buffer_to_read_into
+// net_to_pty::should_poll_write_fd
+// net_to_pty::should_poll_read_fd
 //  if ptyfd < 0: //sibling told us ptyfd is down?
 //    if sibling && sibling->netfd >= 0: netfd = -1; //do not close netfd, sibling uses it (if sibling exists)!
 //    close_and_detach;
@@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ static unsigned char read_byte_unescaping_IAC(int *iac_cnt, unsigned char **pp)
 	return c;
 }
 
-static int net_to_pty__have_data_to_write(void *this)
+static int net_to_pty__should_poll_write_fd(void *this)
 {
 	//connection_t *conn = this;
 	net_to_pty_t *ts = this;
@@ -471,7 +471,7 @@ static int net_to_pty__write(void *this)
 	found = memchr(buf, IAC, wr);
 	if (found == buf) {
 		/* The first char is IAC.
-		 * have_data_to_write() ensures we are only called this way
+		 * should_poll_write_fd() ensures we are only called this way
 		 * if there are two IACs.
 		 * It also ensures the buffer is not wrapping within 7 chars.
 		 * Write one IAC. If that works, skip both.
@@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ static int net_to_pty__write(void *this)
 }
 
 /* Check if buffer has space to read into */
-static int net_to_pty__have_buffer_to_read_into(void *this)
+static int net_to_pty__should_poll_read_fd(void *this)
 {
 	//connection_t *conn = this;
 	net_to_pty_t *ts = this;
@@ -619,17 +619,17 @@ static int net_to_pty__read(void *this)
 static net_to_pty_t *new_net_to_pty(int from, int to)
 {
 	net_to_pty_t *this = xzalloc(sizeof(*this) + TO_PTY_BUFSIZE);
-	this->have_buffer_to_read_into = net_to_pty__have_buffer_to_read_into;
-	this->have_data_to_write       = net_to_pty__have_data_to_write;
-	this->read                     = net_to_pty__read;
-	this->write                    = net_to_pty__write;
+	this->should_poll_read_fd  = net_to_pty__should_poll_read_fd;
+	this->should_poll_write_fd = net_to_pty__should_poll_write_fd;
+	this->read                 = net_to_pty__read;
+	this->write                = net_to_pty__write;
 	this->read_fd = from;
 	this->write_fd = to;
 	/* indexes and size are all 0 */
 	return this;
 }
 
-static int pty_to_net__have_buffer_to_read_into(void *this)
+static int pty_to_net__should_poll_read_fd(void *this)
 {
 	//connection_t *conn = this;
 	pty_to_net_t *ts = this;
@@ -725,7 +725,7 @@ static int pty_to_net__read(void *this)
 	return count;
 }
 
-static int pty_to_net__have_data_to_write(void *this)
+static int pty_to_net__should_poll_write_fd(void *this)
 {
 	pty_to_net_t *ts = this;
 	if (ts->size == 0) {
@@ -832,10 +832,10 @@ static int pty_to_net__write(void *this)
 static pty_to_net_t *new_pty_to_net(int from, int to)
 {
 	pty_to_net_t *this = xzalloc(sizeof(*this) + TO_NET_BUFSIZE);
-	this->have_buffer_to_read_into = pty_to_net__have_buffer_to_read_into;
-	this->have_data_to_write       = pty_to_net__have_data_to_write;
-	this->read                     = pty_to_net__read;
-	this->write                    = pty_to_net__write;
+	this->should_poll_read_fd  = pty_to_net__should_poll_read_fd;
+	this->should_poll_write_fd = pty_to_net__should_poll_write_fd;
+	this->read                 = pty_to_net__read;
+	this->write                = pty_to_net__write;
 	this->read_fd = from;
 	this->write_fd = to;
 	/* indexes and size are all 0 */
@@ -1013,10 +1013,10 @@ static int accept_conn__return_zero(void *this UNUSED_PARAM)
 static struct accept_conn *new_accept_conn(int fd)
 {
 	struct accept_conn *this = xzalloc(sizeof(*this));
-	this->have_buffer_to_read_into = accept_conn__can_accept;
-	this->have_data_to_write       = accept_conn__return_zero;
-	this->read                     = accept_conn__accept;
-	//this->write                    = accept_conn__return_zero; //never called
+	this->should_poll_read_fd  = accept_conn__can_accept;
+	this->should_poll_write_fd = accept_conn__return_zero;
+	this->read                 = accept_conn__accept;
+	//this->write                = accept_conn__return_zero; //never called
 	this->read_fd = fd;
 	this->write_fd = -1;
 	return this;
-- 
2.47.3