Re: [PATCH] libbb: rename two fields in ioloop_state, no logic changes
Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia via busybox <[email protected]> Tue, 21 Apr 2026 21:06:54 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.busybox |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABDcavaU62axdyTmajiq52O932q5GMvy601kw5Xzyy0EHAn64g@mail.gmail.com> |
El El mar, 21 abr 2026 a las 20:35, Roberto A. Foglietta < [email protected]> escribió: > On Tue, 21 Apr 2026 at 19:24, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > El El mar, 21 abr 2026 a las 16:54, Roberto A. Foglietta < > [email protected]> escribió: > >> > >> On Tue, 21 Apr 2026 at 12:23, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia via busybox > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > Hi Victor, > >> > > >> > This patch is already included in git. I assume you did not mean to > send it ? > >> > > >> > >> My interpretation of sending that patch is: the git.busybox.net > >> changed during a period of downtime, therefore some people did not > >> accept that > > > > > > It is simpler than that. He’s sending a patch that is not his own, and > is taken from git HEAD. Probably a mistake with git format-patch or similar. > > > > Irrelevant, because he sent a patch of his own as well Of course but obviously I am not talking about that one. I simply warned him that he had sent an additional patch that was already in git. Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia [email protected] _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] https://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox