Re: [PATCH] libbb: rename two fields in ioloop_state, no logic changes

Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia via busybox <[email protected]> Tue, 21 Apr 2026 21:06:54 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.linux.busybox
Message-ID <CABDcavaU62axdyTmajiq52O932q5GMvy601kw5Xzyy0EHAn64g@mail.gmail.com>
El El mar, 21 abr 2026 a las 20:35, Roberto A. Foglietta <
[email protected]> escribió:

> On Tue, 21 Apr 2026 at 19:24, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > El El mar, 21 abr 2026 a las 16:54, Roberto A. Foglietta <
> [email protected]> escribió:
> >>
> >> On Tue, 21 Apr 2026 at 12:23, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia via busybox
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hi Victor,
> >> >
> >> > This patch is already included in git. I assume you did not mean to
> send it ?
> >> >
> >>
> >> My interpretation of sending that patch is: the git.busybox.net
> >> changed during a period of downtime, therefore some people did not
> >> accept that
> >
> >
> > It is simpler than that. He’s sending a patch that is not his own, and
> is taken from git HEAD. Probably a mistake with git format-patch or similar.
> >
>
> Irrelevant, because he sent a patch of his own as well


Of course but obviously I am not talking about that one. I simply warned
him that he had sent an additional patch that was already in git.

Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia
[email protected]

_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox