Re: security alerts in busybox
"Roberto A. Foglietta via busybox" <[email protected]> Fri, 24 Apr 2026 20:00:55 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.busybox |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJGKYO4THMDSkt6=MNAfJpsnf72eFOvDv3O4PSycEXraX14psg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Fri, 24 Apr 2026 at 19:44, Aaro Koskinen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2026 at 07:30:22PM +0200, Roberto A. Foglietta wrote: > > (1) These are trivial alerts, therefore I faced it first to provide an > > example. [...] And the second main question is straightforward: (2) > > does this fix worth 177 bytes? In relative terms it is 150 ppm > > compared with the full size footprint. In terms of certifications is a > > solid step towards peace of mind. > > IMHO, it does not make sense to churn the code just to silence some > random unnamed tool without any real proper reason, and it certainly > does not give any piece of mind. I read: "random unnamed tool" -- I see what is the information you are seeking for... LOL Spoiler: usually the security reports have a graceful period of time, a few weeks or months. Guess by yourself why. ;-) Best regards, R-