Re: security alerts in busybox

Hi,

On Fri, Apr 24, 2026 at 10:49:05PM +0200, Roberto A. Foglietta wrote:
> However for the sake of the truth, it is not "my" tool, it is open
> source and widely adopted in companies.

So why not then name it?

> Again, because you did not get the main points:
> 
> 1. I don't care about your consensus and I do not need it, because
> GPLv2 is enough
> 
> and
> 
> 2. I don't need to share anything else apart from the code changes
> because GPLv2.

This mailing list is about developing mainline Busybox, and if you don't
care about comments you receive, then fine but, then don't expect your
patches will get forward. If you want to get some credibility for your
patches, then provide clear rationale in the commit message instead of
just saying "let's fix something". Also you are free to maintain your
own fork, but you don't have to (or even should not to) advertise it
here constantly.

A.