Re: security alerts in busybox
"Roberto A. Foglietta via busybox" <[email protected]> Sat, 25 Apr 2026 00:33:50 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.busybox |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJGKYO49TM0o2DBbkOwwRUi0xtv9eAojwZXR=E589dHV=1q4FQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Sat, 25 Apr 2026 at 00:11, Aaro Koskinen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2026 at 11:56:57PM +0200, Roberto A. Foglietta wrote: > > -> Spoiler: usually the security reports have a graceful period of > > time, a few weeks or months. Guess by yourself why. ;-) > > > > Yes, I confirm to you. There are rules > > I can easily wait a year or two... Still after that, your security patch > will be laughed upon. > I am going to create a mlist also (already did), because there is a chance that this would not be available anymore for that time follwoing this policy of doing. And you should have guess it when I wrote that I started from the trivials one set of vulnerabilities. And if you would have visited the security branch, you would have found also a buffer overflow discovered months ago and no one cared about it before I did. The assumption that 200/16 = 12 or 13 trivial problems is very optimistic especially because there are 76 tools like the one I used and their coverage is much wider. Your is the same supposition the turkeys do every year before the feast: up to now, everything is fine. There is no free luch, also in free software. Who took the software "official" AS-IS instead of paying, paid in risk instead of money. For this "novel" way of doing, I have invented a new definition: total cost of mistake ownership, few yeara ago. Your "future" is my past, already. You do not even need to wait, it is happening now. Best regards, R-