Re: security alerts in busybox
"Roberto A. Foglietta via busybox" <[email protected]> Sun, 26 Apr 2026 18:39:36 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.busybox |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJGKYO78=EZkj8eoSdSY7-5RraV9qSxg8Ytmxik6=g57u725pQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Sun, 26 Apr 2026 at 18:31, Tim Tassonis via busybox <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, there actually is quite an established consensus among experienced experienced idiots, but also for plain idiots. Consensus is for all, and useless. Expert seniors know how to walk on their own legs otherwise they get old not experts. Please, do not invite me to tell you how you have to stick into the "consensus"... LOL > And I think randomly replacing ctime with ctime_r is exactly that: just > another needless lock at the front door. Please, note that nobody is trying to force you to adopt it. Despite someone crying loud for Denys authority to establish the order. I will not even Denys to enforce on you ctime_r and I will protect you granting you get the version with ctime also when you will be in need of a health-assistance device. Never thought that you or some of you beloved ones could be victims of bad software development practices? Best regards, R-