Re: Automatic reports boosted by AI create burden on maintainers

On Thu, Apr 30, 2026 at 2:13 AM Roberto A. Foglietta
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> However, without security everything else is nil. It is a matter of
> fact, it is something EU will enforce upon busybox as well. Stop
> bothering me, especially because I did not read anything from anyone
> from the busybox m-list that can withstand up with what is going to
> arrive. Whether you like it or not.

EU cannot mandate anything for a project that's powered by volunteers.
If you're paid by a company to make a "secure" solution based on
BusyBox then there's nothing that can stop your work.

>
> And BTW, I am not here to lead. As well I am not here to debate. I do,
> whatever you like or not. The era of consensus is over. Review the
> code, improve the code, and I will accept the code. BTW the code VDA
> (or someone that is impersonating him) pushed on github, isn't
> something that I have seen before from VdA. And this is a matter of
> another thread.

Whether you "accept" the code is irrelevant. You're free to keep your
BusyBox fork, but you're not on the position that can push your vision
onto the original BusyBox project here.
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox