Re: [PATCH] vi: POSIX backslashes in expand_args

David Laight via busybox <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.busybox
Message-ID <20260818090437.634da4f8@pumpkin>
On Tue, 18 Aug 2026 08:54:11 +1000
Morgan via busybox <[email protected]> wrote:

> vi: POSIX backslashes in expand_args

POSIX won't say anything about the way vi should handle \ escapes.
The best you can do is look at how other re-implementations of vi
behave.

	David

> 
> The previous behaviour treated every backslash as escaping a character,
> rather than following POSIX, which only removes backslashes where they
> are escaping a special character.
> 
> And so only one backslash is lost when having a chain of backslashes
> with a percent sign at the end. (plus any shell handling of backslashes
> in unquoted arguments)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Morgan Bartlett <[email protected]>
> 
> diff --git a/editors/vi.c b/editors/vi.c
> index ba607bcfd..d91a4a504 100644
> --- a/editors/vi.c
> +++ b/editors/vi.c
> @@ -2696,7 +2696,9 @@ static char *expand_args(char *args)
>  		} else if (*s == '#') {
>  			replace = alt_filename;
>  		} else {
> -			if (*s == '\\' && s[1] != '\0') {
> +			/* According to POSIX, backslash-escapes are ignored
> unless they
> +			 * escape a special character. It gives an example
> of \\% expanding to \% */
> +			if (*s == '\\' && (s[1] == '%' || s[1] == '#')) {
>  				char *t;
>  				for (t = s; *t; t++)
>  					*t = t[1];
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> busybox mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.