Re: Hiding inter-library dependencies.

Hey everybody again,

I'm using --allow-shlib-undefined to achieve this. Does anybody knows
what kind of headaches I may face in future when using this!?

Bye!

2016-08-16 11:14 GMT-03:00 Daniel. <[email protected]>:
> Hi everybody!
>
> Suppose that I have 3 shared files,
> and two target machines M1 and M2.
>
> libA.so, libB.so and libC.so.
>
> libB.so is linked against libA.so only when compiled
> to M1, but not in M2.
>
> libC.so is aways linked against libB.so
>
> So we have:
>
> M1: libA.so <- libB.so <- libC.so <- executable.
> M2:                   libB.so <- libC.so <-executable
>
> I want to hide libA.so need while linking libB,
> so that libC has not to pass -lA to linker depending
> on machine. And to
> hide libB and libA while linking to libC, so that
> the user need to pass only -lC. Is that possible?
>
> For example, linking in M1 would be:
> cc -fPIC -shared -o libA.so libA.c
> cc -fPIC -shared -o libB.so libB.c -lA
> cc -fPIC -shared -o libC.so libC.c -lB (no need to -lA is the point here)
> cc -o executable executable.c -lC (no need to -lB -lA is the point here)
>
> And for M2 would be:
> cc -fPIC -shared -o libB.so libB.c
> cc -fPIC -shared -o libC.so -lB
> cc -o executable executable.c -lC
>
> In both cases (machines) the compilation of executable and libC
> is done by the same command line.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> --
> "Do or do not. There is no try"
>   Yoda Master



-- 
"Do or do not. There is no try"
  Yoda Master
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-c-programming" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html