Re: Naming convention ?

On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 15:13, Vincent Hanquez wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 03:08:56PM +0100, Moreno Baricevic wrote:
> > IMHO, the only naming convention for oM stuff could/should be the
> > leading "om", if the rest of the name is meaningful (or at least it
> > sounds cool ;) it may help the user to remember the command and
> > understand what the program is expected to do. Is clear that omd is a
> > openMosix daemon, but it's not clear that it handles process
> > migration...
> 
> well that's fortunate then, since it doesn't handle process migration.
> omd is just a load balancer.

it means that migd is misleading and that I should read the mails
twice...  o:-)




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642