Re: Re: v2.6.16

On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 06:47:09PM +0200, Vincent Hanquez wrote:
>
> > However, the resulting changes are quite extensive and obviously
> > include none-OM code. Therefore, I suspect that I have used the wrong
> > standard kernel version. Did you use the one from ftp.kernel.org?
> 
> I checked there's nothing that shouldn't be there.
> 
> which non-OM code are you refering to ?

For example, this patch seems to be missing:
http://www.kernel.org/hg/linux-2.6/?fd=792fab3c761f;file=arch/alpha/kernel/process.c

The resulting diff against the vanilla 2.6.16 is really huge:
$ wc diff 
974743  3835399 31234520 diff

A.
-- 
Ansgar Esztermann
Researcher & Sysadmin
http://www2.thphy.uni-duesseldorf.de/~ansgar

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFENl3lwAkt8h1/xRgRAowIAJ9q7ZVX3oRRvH312bTfv/gGPh+wJgCgighl
BPUBq0o5Aq9+hgRnol7Yo/o=
=ugDD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----