Re: Porting OM-2.4.26 patch

William-
  the only problem I see here is making sure that you as 2.4.X
compatible version of ROCKS. I thought the current version had moved
on to a 2.6 kernel. ROCKS being based on Redhat is going to be a bear
to back port to a 2.4 kernel from the 2.6.

Evan

On 5/4/06, William Rizzo <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> 2006/5/4, Vincent Hanquez <tab-mTI/[email protected]>:
> > On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 01:06:22PM +0200, William Rizzo wrote:
> > > we're planning to move our OM cluster to the 2.4.32 kernel...the main
> idea
> > > is to move a "Rocks Cluster" also to an OM cluster and join the machines
> in
> > > the first OM.
> > > contextually we want to port the om-2.4.26 and migshm patches to the
> > > mentioned kernel (2.4.32).
> > > We haven't good coders here. just enthusiastic people :).
> > >
> > > Do you think that will be an hard work?
> >
> > It should be fairly trivial, starting from Voxus' version:
> >
> > http://dev.gentoo.org/~voxus/om/
>
>
>  i see several migshm patches....
>  from wich patch should we start? (in this website)
>  migshm-no-mfs-20050716....this looks the best one.
>
>
> > --
> > Vincent Hanquez
>
>
> Thanks Vincent,
>
>  William
>


-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642