Re: migration daemons and zeroconf
"Matt Dew" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.cluster.openmosix.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Evan, Thanks for the reply. For fat clients, I was thinking of letting zeroconf do service broadcasting as well as the node discovery. IE. ip 192.168.0.3 has a 1.7GHz proc with 512MB of free mem and a load of .1. I was looking at http://avahi.org/ Thoughts? Matt >>> "Evan Hisey" <[email protected]> 06/29/06 11:21 AM >>> Matt- Main issue with using zeroconf is bloat over head. Using a custom compact small daemon is amust when thinking about something that is could be used in a diskless configuration. As an optional detection system( the abilty to use multiple deamons was somethig I had looked in too), for fat clients it would be great especially as zeroconf is becoming more popular wiht major distrobutions. Evan On 6/28/06, Matt Dew <[email protected]> wrote: > Has anyone looked at using zeroconf for the userspace migration daemons? > > > > > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > openMosix-devel mailing list > openMosix-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openmosix-devel > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642