Re: om-2.6 patch for kcomd (pre-pre-alpha)
tab-mTI/[email protected] (Vincent Hanquez)
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.cluster.openmosix.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 01:36:15PM -0600, Matt Dew wrote: > DOH! Accidentally hit send. Sorry 'bout that. > > I've put my stuff on > http://www.osource.org/openmosix/om-26.html > > The patch is against the vanilla 2.6.16 instead of against git. > > I've tested the patch on there now, om-2.6-full-20060714.patch.bz2, and > it applies, compiles and runs. Is that possible to have a patch against latest git ? just some random bit of my quick review: - do not continue after accept_connection - spin_lock and unlock really need to be there when browsing (list_for_each) the nodes. why has that been uncommented ? - some word about the CLONE_FS|CLOSE_FILES ? I believe that useful to be able to close all stuff from the module exit call. However that seems wrong .. not sure with which thread is that sharing fs/files. - header of kcom.h is wrong, please take the one from hpc/kcom.c - you are still allocating the socket - lots of commented lines. that should definitively be cleaned up. - proc_pid_set_where looks overly changed, and most of the stuff should not be there. - "char buf='testbug';" is that really compiling ? - p->om.whereto - too much slabs. I think only the pkt slab is needed. With smaller documented patches, I may be able to be more specific though. Cheers, -- Vincent Hanquez ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV