Re: oM 2.6, let's get working, todolist ?
"Matt Dew" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.cluster.openmosix.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Is this in the Wiki or anywhere online, so we can keep it updated? <snip> > > * kcomd completion in progress. > * migrating current API to kcomd in progress. > * handle execve_on_remote correctly. > * simplify fork_on_remote thanks to kcomd. > * fix process coming back when there's a problem (unsupported syscall, > etc...) on the remote > * completion of process, doesn't return back the exit value to deputy. > - fix some _user macro that are not supposed to sleep to work with kcomd > (workaround already there AFAIK) > - move /proc use to /omctrfs/ Where is the 'where' file located? > - known nodes export through /omctrlfs Is this still the planned structure? http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=11584308&forum_id=7969 > - move nodes structure to reference count. > - handle 32 bit migrated process on 64 bit > - fix remote to remote. will be easier with kcomd. > > '*' are mandatory > > access to remote cpus information, are to be done through userspace. > specially since the kernelspace has no idea on the real map of nodes. > kernel has a narrow view of the map, which consist on only the nodes > it is communicating with (processes migrated to or from this node) > Thoughts on this idea? http://www.osource.org/openmosix/balancer.php Matt ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV