Re: nethack, you *will* migrate, really!! : suggestion for double request checking...
tab-mTI/[email protected] (Vincent Hanquez) Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:09:41 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.cluster.openmosix.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 11:22:28PM +0200, Florian Delizy wrote: > I found the reason why the nethack process would not migrate, tell me if > I am wrong, but it seems that processes can only migrate on sycall enter > (or schedule enter). > > If the move request gets to the task during a syscall, it is simply > discarded, and the process does not migrate at all. I understand this > makes sense for a normal HPC process (cpu consuming, means, no or nearly > no syscall), but I think it would make sense to try migration on syscall > exit (this is what this patch should do). > > Vincent, can you please tell me if I am right ? or so ? Are you using PREEMPT ? -- Vincent Hanquez ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV