Re: a FAQ(?) which I do not see covered in the FAQ...
"Lars O. Grobe" <[email protected]> Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:20:24 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.cluster.openmosix.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, a note from a non-expert. OpenMosix is meant for high-performance-computing (hpc) clusters, not for failover setups. As processes migrate (they are not "mirrored"), processes on a failing node die (however, if the node is stopped in a clean way they will migrate away from the node). Actually, I would consider the stability of such a cluster decreasing with the number of nodes, as one error in the entire cluster can actually kill any process (and you do not know on which node the critical process actually runs at the time of failure). It is a bit like Raid-0 vs Raid-1. CU Lars. P.S.: You might still use openMosix in a failover setup, if you bind the critical services to the home node (and if that fails, they get started on the failover system) and still keep running less critical processes openMosix-controlled. That way you could use all processing power and still have a controlled failover. Somewhat an exotic setup still... ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV