Re: [Om-2-6-users] Openmosix 2.6.22 project still continuing

On Fri, 2007-08-10 at 10:51 -0700, Jonathan Day wrote:
> In light of, ummmm, some of the more lively? responses
> to my posts from earlier, it would be good if we could
> work on agreeing a summary of objectives for the
> rebranded project.

It would also be interesteing to know how oM:tng (or whatever) plans to
differentiate itself from other SSI clustering alternatives,
specifically OpenSSI and Kerrighed.

  ( www.openssi.eu , www.openssi.org , www.kerrighed.org )

In spite of some harsh words in various directions, it is unclear to me
as a past casual user of openMosix whether there is any significant
differences in ovarall goals or user experience.  Thus, I worry that
there is much duplication of effort between the projects, and whether it
wouldn't be better to simply migrate to one of the other projects to
focus resources there.

As you probably can tell, I don't know a lot about the technical details
here, I'd be happy to hear your thoughts, and in particular, I'd love to
hear about user experiences with other SSI technologies.

-k



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/