Re: Need application ...
"Ian Latter" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.cluster.openmosix.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello Joel, There's a "yardstick" value for each host. If you set your home node to a very low value (making it look like a very slow computer) while you set the other cluster nodes to a very high value (making them look like very fast computers), then you might get what you're after. The user-space tool "mosctl" allows manipulation of this value. See also; http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.cluster.openmosix.general/9356 http://www.democritos.it/~baro/sw/man/mosctl.1.html http://www.linux.com/howtos/openMosix-HOWTO/x739.shtml ----- Original Message ----- >From: "Joel Hollingsworth" <[email protected]> >To: "Bruce Knox" <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: [openMosix-general] Need application ... >Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 13:17:10 -0500 > > Thanks for the reply Bruce. > > I am looking for an application that performs fairly poorly on an > openMosix cluster due to the fact that it migrates quite often. I was > hoping that "make -j" suggestion would generate many (mostly > unnecessary) short-lived migrations. > > I have implemented a low-level single-segment networking protocol > that can be used to replace TCP on a local cluster. I have ported > openMosix to use my protocol instead of TCP to perform migrations. I > wish to compare openMosix-using-my-protocol to openMosix-using-TCP. > The only possible advantage I might have is due the amount of time to > migrate a process. If I compare the two using a CPU-bound job, then > the saved time in migration will be mostly hidden by the time spent > on on the CPU. > > I wanted a real-world application if at all possible, but in absence > of that I will fall back to a much more contrived application. I have > timings based on individual migrations (time to migrate a single > process of a certain size). I am looking for an application where > using my protocol shows an obvious overall wall-clock time improvement. > > -joel > > On Nov 20, 2005, at 12:18 PM, Bruce Knox wrote: > > Joel, your objective is not clear to me. You said you wanted to > > see many migrations with a real-world application, but what is the > > point of having the cluster migrate unnecessarily? Are you just > > wanting to observe the migrations? > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today > Register for a JBoss Training Course. Free Certification Exam > for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit: > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7628&alloc_id=16845&op=click > _______________________________________________ > openMosix-general mailing list > openMosix-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openmosix-general > -- Ian Latter Late night coder .. http://midnightcode.org/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today Register for a JBoss Training Course. Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit: http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7628&alloc_id=16845&op=click