Re: Switch or Hub
"Carl Radford (DC0854-IT)" <[email protected]> Wed, 5 Jul 2006 03:58:50 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.cluster.openmosix.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA52872BEA6FD41182A50008C724B23003F30004@corp01uk.bordersgroupinc.com> |
On a very small cluster, the choice of switch or hub makes very little difference (you don't say how many nodes). A switch will introduce latency into the network that a hub does not, but the switch may reduce collisions, depending on packet size and transmission rate. Experimenting with various configurations on a 12 node cluster yielded the following results running the same benchmark. Swapping a switch in place of a hub, 2% improvement (mostly due to reduced retransmissions/collisions). Swapping a well known brand of network cards (chipset often used on motherboards) for higher quality network cards, 9% improvement. My advice: Do not use a cheap switch, less RAM, low backplane bandwidth, and more latency make a poor cluster, you may get better results with a hub. Invest in good network cards that have linux drivers that do not require the kernel to relocate the packet data memory offset to transfer it to/from the card. If you are building a large professional cluster with a budget of $10,000's get advice from somewhere else, you should probably be using something like Myrinet and not Ethernet in the first place ( I wish :>). Happy clustering Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ openMosix-general mailing list openMosix-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openmosix-general