[ ssic-linux-Bugs-1201723 ] Reopen of unlinked files

"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.cluster.ssic.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Bugs item #1201723, was opened at 2005-05-13 19:42
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by rogertsang
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=405834&aid=1201723&group_id=32541

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: Process Management
Group: v1.9.1
>Status: Closed
Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Brian J. Watson (bjbrew)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Reopen of unlinked files

Initial Comment:
In the 2.4 kernel, there is the ability to reopen
unlinked files on a remote node, using its file handle
rather than the pathname that is typically used. The
code for this exists on 2.6, in reop_export_path() and
reop_import_path(), but it's not working. It should be
fixed sometime.

For those who don't know, reopen is a part of process
migration. It automatically attaches the process' file
descriptors to the appropriate file-type object
(regular file, socket, pipe, device, etc.), even if the
object is on another node. The reopen code is also used
for sending file descriptors via Unix domain sockets to
a process on another node, and for opening a
/proc/<pid>/fd/ symlink that might point to a remote
object.

Brian

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Roger Tsang (rogertsang)
Date: 2007-10-11 22:33

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=1246761
Originator: NO

Probably a regression of my rmtfb fixes in 1.9.2

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Roger Tsang (rogertsang)
Date: 2007-08-12 20:19

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=1246761
Originator: NO

There are no related vproc fixes since 1.9.2.  Are we missing info in the
original bug report?  Or we accidentally fixed this in 1.9.2?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: John Hughes (hughesj)
Date: 2007-08-09 05:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=166336
Originator: NO

This works for me on 1.9.3 (I'm pretty sure it works on 1.9.1 as well).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Niklas (nkolster)
Date: 2005-12-14 17:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=1390928

If anyone has a patch I am very willing to help out with
testing.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=405834&aid=1201723&group_id=32541

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.