[ ssic-linux-Bugs-1201723 ] Reopen of unlinked files
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.cluster.ssic.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Bugs item #1201723, was opened at 2005-05-13 19:42 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by rogertsang You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=405834&aid=1201723&group_id=32541 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Process Management Group: v1.9.1 >Status: Closed Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Brian J. Watson (bjbrew) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Reopen of unlinked files Initial Comment: In the 2.4 kernel, there is the ability to reopen unlinked files on a remote node, using its file handle rather than the pathname that is typically used. The code for this exists on 2.6, in reop_export_path() and reop_import_path(), but it's not working. It should be fixed sometime. For those who don't know, reopen is a part of process migration. It automatically attaches the process' file descriptors to the appropriate file-type object (regular file, socket, pipe, device, etc.), even if the object is on another node. The reopen code is also used for sending file descriptors via Unix domain sockets to a process on another node, and for opening a /proc/<pid>/fd/ symlink that might point to a remote object. Brian ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Roger Tsang (rogertsang) Date: 2007-10-11 22:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1246761 Originator: NO Probably a regression of my rmtfb fixes in 1.9.2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Roger Tsang (rogertsang) Date: 2007-08-12 20:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1246761 Originator: NO There are no related vproc fixes since 1.9.2. Are we missing info in the original bug report? Or we accidentally fixed this in 1.9.2? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John Hughes (hughesj) Date: 2007-08-09 05:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=166336 Originator: NO This works for me on 1.9.3 (I'm pretty sure it works on 1.9.1 as well). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Niklas (nkolster) Date: 2005-12-14 17:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1390928 If anyone has a patch I am very willing to help out with testing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=405834&aid=1201723&group_id=32541 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/