[ ssic-linux-Bugs-1984656 ] semaphore undo count sometimes screws up

"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.cluster.ssic.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Bugs item #1984656, was opened at 2008-06-04 18:41
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=405834&aid=1984656&group_id=32541

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: IPC
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: John Hughes (hughesj)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: semaphore undo count sometimes screws up

Initial Comment:
Testing alsa applications, which use the rather strange idiom that:

DOWN(sem) = SEMOP (wait for semaphore to go to zero, increment semaphore)

UP(sem) = SEMOP (decrement semaphore)

we find that sometimes the semaphore is left at 1 when a process exits, which should be impossible as all operations are done with the SEM_UNDO flag set.

Tracing the ssi_semexit code shows an adjustment of +1 being applied to a semaphore with value 0, which should also be impossible - with this idiom the undo should either be -1 or zero

Argument:

The semaphore is initially zero.  If an application does a DOWN() call then it will have an adjustment of -1.  When it does an UP it will have an adjustment of 0.




----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=405834&aid=1984656&group_id=32541

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.