[ ssic-linux-Bugs-1203912 ] [2.6] Missed signal

"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> Tue, 20 Jan 2009 06:08:52 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.linux.cluster.ssic.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Bugs item #1203912, was opened at 2005-05-17 17:27
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rogertsang
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=405834&aid=1203912&group_id=32541

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: Process Management
Group: v1.9.1
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Brian J. Watson (bjbrew)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: [2.6] Missed signal

Initial Comment:
When demo-proclb is run repeatedly on the most recent
2.6.10 kernel (post 1.9.0), eventually one of the
children misses the SIGUSR1 that's used to tell them to
start processing records. It might take awhile for this
to happen; I usually leave the following running overnight:

# while [ 1 ]; do ./demo-proclb -n 16 datafile; done

This is almost certainly a 2.6 kernel bug, because it
does not happen when I run the same command overnight
on the same test cluster with the latest 2.4 kernel
(post 1.2.2).

Brian

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Roger Tsang (rogertsang)
Date: 2009-01-20 01:08

Message:
Possibly fixed in 1.9.6 with refactoring of
ssi_wait/signal/broadcast_event()

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=405834&aid=1203912&group_id=32541

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.