Re: Software Raid 5

"David Bo Jensen" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.cluster.ssic.user
Message-ID <004601c693d0$6c480e20$2101a8c0@dit3155830689b>
What is AOE devices?
If  Raid 5 is possible as you describe it, then DRBD will not make much 
sense, would it?


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Brown, Larry" <[email protected]>
To: "Ed King" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 7:40 PM
Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: [SSI-users] Software Raid 5


> My apologies, I should have been more specific.  I have also come across
> a number of posts touching on software raid.  I was referring to
> inter-node software raid IE:
>
> md0
> /dev/1/hda2
> /dev/2/hda2
> /dev/3/hda2
> /dev/4/hda2
>
> Where loss of node 1 would not constitute loss of the cluster.  If this
> is not possible with the md code that is in the kernel due to the
> underlying architectural changes, is it possible to do this with AOE
> devices?
>
>
> Larry Brown
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ed King [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 1:27 PM
> To: Brown, Larry
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [SSI-users] Software Raid 5
>
> If you want the root to be fault tolerant, a standard debian
> installation allows this (Sarge 3.1).
>
> We partition each drive with a small boot partition (~50MB) , some swap
> space (1GB) and the rest being allocated for RAID.
>
> The installer is told that the first drive, first partition is mounted
> as boot, the other primary partitions on the other drives are not
> designated to be mounted (the debian installer can't have more than one
> drive mounted to the boot point).
>
> The installer allows the creation of the raid, and we flag that as
> mounting as the root filesystem -- it gives us a very large software
> raid, and on the faster processors can actually give better performance
> than hardware raids.  The boot partition never changes (unless we
> upgrade the kernel) and is small enough so we use dd to copy it over to
> the other unused partitions so all the drives are now bootable.
>
> Brown, Larry wrote:
>> OK, I'm going to ask a stupid question.  I'm sure I must have run
>> across this in the past but can't find any mention of it now...
>>
>> Is it possible to allow a small group of nodes to boot to an init node
>
>> where the init node is still running off initrd, mount their disks
>> with software raid, and pivot root over to them allowing the root
>> filesystem to be fault tolerant with software raid 5?
>>
>> Larry Brown
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ssic-linux-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ssic-linux-users
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ssic-linux-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ssic-linux-users
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.