Re: Software Raid 5
"David Bo Jensen" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.cluster.ssic.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <004601c693d0$6c480e20$2101a8c0@dit3155830689b> |
What is AOE devices? If Raid 5 is possible as you describe it, then DRBD will not make much sense, would it? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brown, Larry" <[email protected]> To: "Ed King" <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 7:40 PM Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: [SSI-users] Software Raid 5 > My apologies, I should have been more specific. I have also come across > a number of posts touching on software raid. I was referring to > inter-node software raid IE: > > md0 > /dev/1/hda2 > /dev/2/hda2 > /dev/3/hda2 > /dev/4/hda2 > > Where loss of node 1 would not constitute loss of the cluster. If this > is not possible with the md code that is in the kernel due to the > underlying architectural changes, is it possible to do this with AOE > devices? > > > Larry Brown > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ed King [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 1:27 PM > To: Brown, Larry > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [SSI-users] Software Raid 5 > > If you want the root to be fault tolerant, a standard debian > installation allows this (Sarge 3.1). > > We partition each drive with a small boot partition (~50MB) , some swap > space (1GB) and the rest being allocated for RAID. > > The installer is told that the first drive, first partition is mounted > as boot, the other primary partitions on the other drives are not > designated to be mounted (the debian installer can't have more than one > drive mounted to the boot point). > > The installer allows the creation of the raid, and we flag that as > mounting as the root filesystem -- it gives us a very large software > raid, and on the faster processors can actually give better performance > than hardware raids. The boot partition never changes (unless we > upgrade the kernel) and is small enough so we use dd to copy it over to > the other unused partitions so all the drives are now bootable. > > Brown, Larry wrote: >> OK, I'm going to ask a stupid question. I'm sure I must have run >> across this in the past but can't find any mention of it now... >> >> Is it possible to allow a small group of nodes to boot to an init node > >> where the init node is still running off initrd, mount their disks >> with software raid, and pivot root over to them allowing the root >> filesystem to be fault tolerant with software raid 5? >> >> Larry Brown >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ssic-linux-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ssic-linux-users >> >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ssic-linux-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ssic-linux-users > >