Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH] new CSA patchset for 2.6.8

Adding [email protected], the CSA user group mailing list, to Cc.

Tim Schmielau wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Aug 2004, Guillaume Thouvenin wrote:
> 
> 
>>  Thus, to be clear, the enhanced accounting can be divided into
>>three parts:
>>
>>    1) A common data collection method in the kernel.
>>       We could start from BSD-accounting and add CSA information. Could
>>       it be something like BSD version4?
> 
> 
> I've had a quick look at the CSA data collection patches. To get the 
> discussion started, here are my comments:
> 
> 
>>--- linux.orig/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c        2004-08-13 22:36:16.000000000 -0700
>>+++ linux/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c     2004-08-18 12:07:10.000000000 -0700
>>@@ -1948,10 +1950,12 @@
>> 
>>        if (rw == READ) {
>>                disk_stat_add(rq->rq_disk, read_sectors, nr_sectors);
>>+               current->rblk += nr_sectors;
>>                if (!new_io)
>>                        disk_stat_inc(rq->rq_disk, read_merges);
>>        } else if (rw == WRITE) {
>>                disk_stat_add(rq->rq_disk, write_sectors, nr_sectors);
>>+               current->wblk += nr_sectors;
>>                if (!new_io)
>>                        disk_stat_inc(rq->rq_disk, write_merges);
>>        }
> 
> 
> Andi Kleen's comment on the ELSA patch also applies here - most writes
> will get accounted to pdflushd. See
> 
> http://www.lib.uaa.alaska.edu/linux-kernel/archive/2004-Week-31/0047.html
> 
> for his comment.

I need more time on this. :)

> 
> 
>>--- /dev/null   1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000
>>+++ linux/include/linux/csa_internal.h  2004-08-19 15:19:05.000000000 -0700
> 
> [...]
> 
>>+#else  /* CONFIG_CSA || CONFIG_CSA_MODULE */
>>+
>>+#define csa_update_integrals()         do { } while (0);
>>+#define csa_clear_integrals(task)      do { } while (0);
>>+#endif /* CONFIG_CSA || CONFIG_CSA_MODULE */
> 
> 
> I suppose the semicolons are unintentional.

Good catch! I fixed this in our internal tree.

> 
> 
>>--- linux.orig/include/linux/sched.h    2004-08-19 15:17:52.000000000 -0700
>>+++ linux/include/linux/sched.h 2004-08-19 15:19:05.000000000 -0700
> 
> [...]
> 
>>@@ -525,6 +527,10 @@
>> 
>> /* i/o counters(bytes read/written, blocks read/written, #syscalls, waittime */
>>         unsigned long rchar, wchar, rblk, wblk, syscr, syscw, bwtime;
>>+#if defined(CONFIG_CSA) || defined(CONFIG_CSA_MODULE)
>>+       unsigned long csa_rss_mem1, csa_vm_mem1;
>>+       clock_t csa_stimexpd;
>>+#endif
> 
> 
> These probably need to be u64, otherwise they might easily overflow within
> a view seconds on 32 bit platforms.

Will fix it.

> 
> 
>>--- /dev/null   1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000
>>+++ linux/include/linux/acct_eop.h      2004-08-19 18:48:44.000000000 -0700
> 
> 
> This should probably be unified with BSD accounting to a general accounting
> hook.

Do you suggest to merge acct_eop.h into acct.h? It sounds good to me!

Thanks!
  - jay

> 
> 
> Tim
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
> FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
> Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Lse-tech mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lse-tech