Re: state of apt-rpm development?
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:07:09 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.conectiva.apt-rpm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 10:15:40AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: > On Wed, 20 Oct 2004, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote: > > > > Just curious -- it's been a while since there's been a new apt-rpm > > > version. Do the developers have anything cool waiting up their > > > sleeves? Or is the project pretty much perfect at this point? :) > > > > Yes, we have something really cool waiting up. It's not a new APT-RPM > > release though, but a completely new software being built to replace > > it, based on the experience acquired in the last few years of package > > managing. It has impressive capabilites if compared to current > > dependency solving softwares (no it won't replace RPM/DPKG). The press > > release is being planned, and I'm starting to think about the > > technical paper explaining the details. > > Looking forward to it... but in the meanwhile we could actually use a new > apt-rpm release, the svn tree does have quite a few fixes and some new > stuff since 0.5.15cnc6. Is there support for multilib in svn? It's sad to see FC/RHEL x86_64 (and the miriads of clones) w/o apt ... :( What (else) is new in svn? Thanks! -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net _______________________________________________ apt-rpm mailing list [email protected] http://distro2.conectiva.com.br/mailman/listinfo/apt-rpm
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBf2U9QBVS1GOamfERArVtAJ0RbJks72fhe0aMHqgW1xhc0zvF9gCgi8Cl dCGSRKyFSg8nCdBEX+xJtGA= =R+1v -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----