Re: state of apt-rpm development?

Axel Thimm <[email protected]> Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:07:09 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.linux.conectiva.apt-rpm
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 10:15:40AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Oct 2004, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote:
> 
> > > Just curious -- it's been a while since there's been a new apt-rpm
> > > version.  Do the developers have anything cool waiting up their
> > > sleeves? Or is the project pretty much perfect at this point? :)
> > 
> > Yes, we have something really cool waiting up. It's not a new APT-RPM
> > release though, but a completely new software being built to replace
> > it, based on the experience acquired in the last few years of package
> > managing.  It has impressive capabilites if compared to current
> > dependency solving softwares (no it won't replace RPM/DPKG). The press
> > release is being planned, and I'm starting to think about the
> > technical paper explaining the details.
> 
> Looking forward to it... but in the meanwhile we could actually use a new 
> apt-rpm release, the svn tree does have quite a few fixes and some new 
> stuff since 0.5.15cnc6.

Is there support for multilib in svn? It's sad to see FC/RHEL x86_64
(and the miriads of clones) w/o apt ... :(

What (else) is new in svn?

Thanks!
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

_______________________________________________
apt-rpm mailing list
[email protected]
http://distro2.conectiva.com.br/mailman/listinfo/apt-rpm
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBf2U9QBVS1GOamfERArVtAJ0RbJks72fhe0aMHqgW1xhc0zvF9gCgi8Cl
dCGSRKyFSg8nCdBEX+xJtGA=
=R+1v
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----