Re: Does apt work in FC3 x86_64 ?

Hi, Matthew:
Thank you very much. I forget to post here 3 days ago, so I did that.
I am sorry if any offence. 
I am just curious about this:
-------------
http://www.linuxtx.org/amd64faq.html, the note for apt is:                      
At this time, apt is *not* biarch compatible, but I am told this is
being * addressed.
-------------
Is that true ? Or should I move to yum or smart in the future ?
The reason I asked again is that I have so many scripts based on apt in
RedHat/Fedora/Mandrake, if I have to move to yum or smart, I must dig a
lot.
I am wondering if my scripts like:
------------
apt-get dist-upgrade -o RPM::Hold::="openssl" -o RPM::Hold::="glibc"
apt-get -y --reinstall -o RPM::RootDir="/tftpboot/node_root/" -o RPM::Install -Options::="--force" -o RPM::Install-Options::="--nodeps" -o RPM::Install-Option
 s::="--noscripts" install kernel-2.4.20-8
------------
or specify the arch in /etc/apt.conf
------------
Architecture "i586";
------------
works in yum or smart ? Does yum or smart has the similiar functions to
do this ?

Thanks again.

Steven.

On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 03:37:02PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 04:33:21AM +0800, Steven Shiau wrote:
> > My question is, does apt work in FC3 x86_64 ? 
> 
> The answer is exactly the same as it was when you posted this to
> freshrpms-list three days ago.
> 
> -- 
> Matthew Miller            [email protected]        <http://www.mattdm.org/>
> -->  Fedora Users & Developers Conference, hosted by Boston University  <--
> February 18th, 2005                       <http://fedoraproject.org/fudcon/>  
> _______________________________________________
> apt-rpm mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://distro2.conectiva.com.br/mailman/listinfo/apt-rpm

-- 
Steven Shiau