Re: Odd bug with pinning repository

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 11:30:57AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> cpan2rpm is a real downgrade-case but the rest ... do the packages you 
> have built yourself have a different release number than the ones coming 
> from distro? I would guess not - or at least I could imagine something 
> like this happening in that scenario.

Most of them are upgrades, but some (perl-CPAN as a quick example) aren't Fedora 
packages at all.

  perl-CPAN:
    Installed: 0:1.76_01-0
    Candidate: 0:1.76_01-0
    Version Table:
   *** 0:1.76_01-0 0
          100 RPM Database
       0:1.76_01-0 0
          500 http://apt-internal.theiqgroup.com IQGroup/os-stable pkglist
       0:1.76_01-0 0
         1001 http://apt-internal.theiqgroup.com IQGroup/os-devel pkglist

In any case, I have the exact same packages as the repository.  The repository 
is actually built from packages I've built locally.  I made the repository to 
ease deployment in our development and production environments, and I want to 
keep it pinned because our Perl is completely different from Fedora's, so none 
of the distro packages will work anyway.

I just don't get why it thinks they're different when they're exactly the same.  
Obviously it's a bug.

- -- 
Stephen Clouse <[email protected]>
Senior Programmer/DBE, Core Technology Developer
The IQ Group, Inc. <http://www.theiqgroup.com/>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCVueWy3uolkRT3A0RAgm+AJ9qJ+icvqxAbd1rjfJVY5sCS9dsugCfX3AT
XnqDo5eaFBb57IhktAZF2Qs=
=C8sa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----