Re: [PATCH 7/7] [v2] drivers/misc: introduce Freescale hypervisor management driver
Timur Tabi <[email protected]> Mon, 6 Jun 2011 11:09:41 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.console,gmane.linux.ports.ppc64.devel,gmane.linux.kernel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Freescale |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Arnd Bergmann wrote: > When we talked about the situation of drivers/misc and drivers/char at > one of the recent conferences, a broad consensus was that they are in > need of a maintainer, which I foolishly signed up for. Deepak wanted > to send an update to the MAINTAINERS file for this (I guess I can do > that too, since he must have forgotten about it), but the main idea is > that I'm there to say no to any driver that someone tries to add there, > unless there are really good reasons why it is actually a good place > to live for that driver. Can you give me an example of a driver that *does* belong in drivers/misc? Frankly, I just don't see what's wrong with a repository of various drivers that don't really belong anywhere else. And what about my concern that my driver will be the only one in drivers/virt? -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-console" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html