Re: [PATCH 7/7] [v4] drivers/virt: introduce Freescale hypervisor management driver
Timur Tabi <[email protected]> Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:24:27 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.console,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.ports.ppc64.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Freescale |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Arnd Bergmann wrote: > The lesson to learn here is obviously not to ship binaries of applications > to customers before the driver has been merged in a mainline kernel. Believe me, I know this, but unfortunately I have no control over every aspect of our development cycle. > The best way out that I can see is to make the driver carry the proper > interface in the upstream version, but to have a private patch to support > both interface versions in the kernel you ship on machines that require > backwards compatibility. Once you have phased out the user application, > you can then drop that patch and use the upstream version of the > interfaces. I think I can make that work. -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-console" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html