Re: loop-aes & util-linux-ng
markus reichelt <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.cryptography |
|---|---|
| Organization | still stuck in reorganization mode |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
* Karel Zak <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 07:21:46PM +0300, Jari Ruusu wrote: > > However, you will need a bleeding edge distro to compile that. It won't > > compile on all boxes. util-linux-2.12r and earlier are compatible with many > > distros, including older ones. It's pretty sad to see such excellent > > compatibility ruined by this "new" -ng version. :( > > Do you have any examples? I'm open for patches that improve > compatibility. Well, your question makes me wonder on which platforms you test your -ng code (and why those?). So, I ran simple some "./configure && make" tests on slackware 12, 11, 10.2, and 10.0 (both plain source of -ng and Jari's patch applied). You seem to be "in the clear" of some serious slackware wrath, it seems. ;p Anyhow, why -ng in the first place; what's wrong with mainline util-linux? A link will do, just curious. -- left blank, right bald
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFG3DnCLMyTO8Kj/uQRArlwAKCQootpcNgThRiKpLNEL+VEr1A/cACffzVF ebBOEOSyukEPeV5ph7r1Oak= =nGv3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----