Re: not sure if this a relevant article for this group-might be of interest
markus reichelt <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.cryptography |
|---|---|
| Organization | still stuck in reorganization mode |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
* Max Vozeler <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 08:35:42PM +0200, markus reichelt wrote: > > * rodger ellis <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > http://groups.google.com/group/linux.debian.kernel/browse_thread/thread/b53dfc2c858687a0/4a5993178f83bb67 > > > > It certainly is of interest to Max Vozeler, and all Debian users > > lurking; it definitely complicates things for Debian users. > > This is not actually a fundamental problem with the Debian kernel, > or other kernels configured with CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LOOP=m. I misinterpreted the report as: loop-AES no longer works with CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LOOP=m under Debian. One of the drawbacks of a package system; users trust it too much when they fiddle with their system. Does the Debian loop-AES package contain loop-AES modules and patched util-linux? If so, then how do people still manage to confuse things like that? -- left blank, right bald
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFG7nWiLMyTO8Kj/uQRAqjgAJwLuntEfi+dKOUtt749DxhzozuOUACffluk RW6iqloiNVLkvIZVj9A9lvE= =8zKQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----