Re: Re: [Dazuko-help] Dazuko and Linux 2.6

Hi,

> It's not too bad. With some hacking, I actually ported the most of it to 2.6
> and had the entire thing at least compiling before I noticed the
> sys_call_table problem. It's getting kind of ugly with 3 levels of ifdefs
> though.... I am going to see if there is a better way of handling the
> version dependent stuff.

One of the things I will be doing is getting rid of the #ifdefs within 
the code. This can be done by defining empty, do-nothing items for the 
versions that do not have these items. I would like the actual code to 
reflect the 2.6 version and use defines at the top so that 2.2 and 2.4 
will work with that code.

> Or maybe you would consider phasing out 2.2 support? I mean is there really
> a lot people still using it?

I am still getting requests to port to 2.0. :)

John Ogness

-- 
Dazuko Maintainer