Re: UNS: Re: ClamFS and DazukoFS

On Mon August 27 2007 4:55:21 am John Ogness wrote:
> I think we may still be interested in offering a FUSE-based version of
> DazukoFS as a "backup". 

Well, if you think you can maintain 3 versions of Dazuko ... (Four, if you 
include LSM vs. syscallls.)

> This would also allow us to focus DazukoFS on ext2/ext3 for a while
> because users could choose the FUSE-based solution for other
> filesystems.

I would hope reiserfs would be the next addition. Despite DazukoFS's problems, 
its performance was much better than mainline 2.3.x.