Re: Signal handling
John Ogness <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.dazuko.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, Which version of Dazuko are you using? This is a bit of a controversial issue, and I am not sure how to handle it. In the new pre-release version of Dazuko, a SIGTERM to the registered application will not only cause dazukoGetAccess to return with an error, but it will also unregister the applicatoin with Dazuko! This would be dangerous for applications that will continue working, even though a SIGTERM has been sent. The advantage of this, is it allows Dazuko to avoid problems of applications not unregistering themselves before they quit. However, I am not happy about this and will be changing it before the next version is released. So what should Dazuko do? Do you think dazukoGetAccess should continue blocking, even though a SIGTERM has been sent? In my opinion this is not an option, since the application *must* have a chance to exit if it wants. A good solution would be if different error codes were returned (rather than simply !0). Then you could know if dazukoGetAccess failed because of some real problem, or because an interruption signal was sent. What do you think? John Ogness Jaroslav Suchanek wrote: > Hi, > > Is it correct, that after sending signal (e.g. SIGTERM) function > dazukoGetAccess always return error code? > > Is there any way, how to handle signal and continue working with dazuko? > > Thanks for all ideas, > > Jaroslav Suchanek