Bug#1109583: please use SRV records to follow instead of using them as overwrites

Hi Julian

 > No that's not how SRV records work or can even work.

I don't think we have the same understanding on "how SRV records work" 
then. however, ...

 > You'd completely violate the basic premise of TLS encryption and
 > authenticity, allowing your local network operator to intercept
 > encrypted communications.

no, as I've written it could mimic the same behaviour as 301 in HTTP(S) 
which obviously doesn't interfer with encryption at all.

but whatever.

Regards,
Daniel