Re: Bug#1022173: Arbitrary and frequent 100% C PU load symptom with Libreoffice Writer 1:7.0.4
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.backports.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
notfound 1022173 1:7.0.4-4+deb11u3_bpo10+1 found 1022173 1:7.0.4-4+deb11u3 tag 1022173 + moreinfo thanks Am 21. Oktober 2022 14:39:13 MESZ schrieb Robin <[email protected]>: >Package: libreoffice-writer >Version: 1:7.0.4-4+deb11u3_bpo10+1 No. You even say the correct version below: 1:7.0.4-4+deb11u3~bpo10+1 The _ is just because the UI displays the ~ wrongly. In a related note, read the docs. https://backports.debian.org/Instructions/ clearly says: "Report Bugs Please report bugs in backported packages to the backports mailing list and NOT to the Debian BTS! " >CPU threads: 1; (...) > $ lscpu > Architecture: i686 > CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit > Byte Order: Little Endian > Address sizes: 32 bits physical, 32 bits virtual > CPU(s): 1 > On-line CPU(s) list: 0 > Thread(s) per core: 1 > Core(s) per socket: 1 > Socket(s): 1 > NUMA node(s): 1 > Vendor ID: GenuineIntel > CPU family: 6 > Model: 13 > Model name: Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.73GHz Wow. Maybe time to get hardware from this or last century even? >$ lsb_release -a >No LSB modules are available. >Distributor ID: Debian >Description: Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster) >Release: 10 >Codename: buster Buster is out of life. Does it still happen with bullseye? (Assume so since the buster-backports version is built from bullseye) Does it happen with the version in bullseye-backports? (Btw, you want to upgrade to deb11u4 backport whenever it is approved immediately to fix a security bug) Regards Rene -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Gerät mit K-9 Mail gesendet.